ILAB Grant: Combat Child & Forced Labor in Critical Mineral Supply Chains
ClosedU.S. Department of Labor — Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB)
Closed — FY2025 solicitation; kept as a reference for ETC's forced-labor / supply-chain traceability work
Description
Federal funding to combat child labor and forced labor in critical mineral supply chains — directly on ETC's forced-labor / supply-chain traceability work. Surfaced via Tavily discovery from grants.gov.
Who's funding this
The coalition behind the opportunity. Tick the backers that are the best fit for ETC to prioritize.
- No backers captured yet — add one below, or run a web import.
AI valuation
Scored against the ETC mission profile.
The topical fit is excellent—this is squarely ETC's forced-labor and supply-chain traceability terrain—but the grant is a large federal implementation cooperative agreement, not an applied-research/prototyping award, and ILAB overwhelmingly funds experienced international-development implementers with field presence. ETC should not pursue this as a lead; instead explore joining a lead implementer's consortium as the traceability/tech-prototyping partner, where its NYU CGA + Microsoft Research credibility adds distinctive value at manageable effort.
Criteria breakdown
Child/forced labor in critical mineral supply chains maps almost perfectly onto ETC's forced-labor and supply-chain traceability focus areas and its verifiable-ethical-claims work.
ILAB's $9M cooperative agreements typically fund multi-year, field-based program implementation (monitoring, capacity-building in producer countries), not applied research and prototyping; the size and structure poorly match ETC's researcher/staff-time and prototype model.
ILAB awards overwhelmingly go to established international-development implementers (ILO, Verité, Winrock, Solidarity Center) with on-the-ground presence and past DOL performance; ETC would be uncompetitive as a lead but plausible as a tech/traceability subrecipient.
Federal cooperative agreements demand heavy proposals—detailed logframes, monitoring/evaluation plans, extensive budgets, past-performance narratives—and onerous reporting, straining ETC's limited grant-writing bandwidth.
A federal DOL award would meaningfully elevate ETC's forced-labor/traceability portfolio and open institutional relationships, but the strategic upside is more realistic through a partnering role than a solo lead.
Red flags
- Scope mismatch: ILAB funds large-scale international program implementation and field monitoring, not lab-to-field prototyping—likely requires on-the-ground operations in mineral-producing countries outside ETC's wheelhouse.
- $9M award size implies extensive field staffing and subgrantee management ETC is not structured to lead.
- Eligibility and scoring strongly favor organizations with prior DOL/ILAB past performance and international field presence; ETC has none as lead.
- Heavy federal application and compliance/reporting burden relative to ETC's bandwidth.
Scored Jul 8, 2026 · claude-opus-4-8
Proposal recommendation
An AI starting draft tailored to this funder's criteria.
No draft yet. Click Draft with AIfor a tailored project title, core pitch, the key aspects to lead with, a suggested outline, and the gaps to shore up. Add the funder's review criteria for a sharper draft.
Recommendations & tips
A grantseeking playbook tailored to this funder — how to position, what to write, and what to do next.
No tips yet. Click Get tips with AIfor a prioritized set of funder-specific recommendations — positioning, proposal craft, budget, process, and the pitfalls to avoid — plus concrete next actions. Add the funder's review criteria and a description for sharper advice.
Similar challenges
Find other coalitions / challenges like this one to also target.